Defense planning and management is a comprehensive endeavor that encompasses six different areas. There are three core areas: force, resource and weapon systems planning; and three supporting streams: logistics, C4SRI (command, control, communication computer, surveillance, reconnaissance, information) ), and civil emergency. Defense planning relates to other disciplines, such as air and naval technology development, standardization, intelligence, operational planning, and force generation.
Given the current economic constraints arising from the government’s limited budget( Rp 32 trillions or less than 1 % of GDP of Rp 5,220 trillion, and 4,6 % of annual budget of about Rp 780 trillion for fiscal 2008) the underlying theme of Indonesian defense planning for the near and mid-term future is to enhance efficiency by drastically reducing leakages and wastages, especially in the procurement and acquisitions of weapon systems, defense equipment and supplies.
Force planning
Force planning deals specifically with providing Indonesia with the forces and capabilities of the tri-services to execute their range of missions, in accordance with the Indonesia doctrine of total defence and security (sishankamrata). It seeks to ensure that Indonesia develop sustainable and interoperable forces, which can function even with limited or scarce budgetary resources.
The force planning process is based on three sequential elements: general political guidance, planning targets and defense reviews. Political guidance sets out the overall aims to be met, incorporating President S.B. Yudhoyono’s concept of Minimum Essential Force (MEF) that establishes in military terms the number, scale and nature of operational readiness and force structure that the country as a whole should at a minimum be able to deploy.
Planning targets include both a detailed determination of an integrated tri-service force (Tri-Matra Terpadu) requirements and the setting of implementation targets to fulfill those requirements. Defense reviews provide a means to assess the degree to which planning targets are being met. The term ‘force planning’ is often confused with that of ‘defense planning’, which is much broader (includes non-military defense planning), and that of ‘operational planning’, which is conducted for specific, tactical and command-level military operations, including balancing strike force, support and maintenance/repair capabilities.
Resources Planning
National resources comprise human resources, natural resources and man-made resources. National resource planning aims to provide the country with the capabilities it needs, but focuses on the elements that are joined in common funding; each service (Angkatan) pool resources within a nation-wide total defense framework.
Resource planning is closely linked to operational planning, which aims to ensure that the Indonesian Defense Force (Tentara Nasional Indonesia, TNI) fulfill its present and minimum operational commitments and face new threats such as terrorism and bio-chemical weapons. There is a distinction between joint funding and common funding: joint funding covers activities, managed by the Ministry of Defense (Dephan) and TNI Headquarters (Mabes TNI), such as integrated acquisitions and procurement of common use items.
Common funding involves three different budgets: the civil budget, which covers the running costs of Dephan and Mabes TNI; the military budget, which essentially covers the running costs of TNI’s integrated command structure and the nation-wide communication and air defense networks; and the Defense Acquisitions Program that covers nation-wide procurement requirements for communication systems, air defense systems and networks of naval stations and bases, fuel supplies and command structures. The military budget and the Defense Acquisitions Program support the theatre headquarter elements for the Army, Navy and Air Force. Relatively speaking, these budgets represent a small amount of money, but they are important for the cohesion and the integration of capabilities of the tri-services.
Weapon Systems Planning
Weapon systems planning is one of the main constituting elements of Dephan’s defense planning process. It aims to support the country’s political and economic objectives and focuses on the development of inter-service (but not common-funded) programs. It does this by promoting cost-effective acquisition, co-operative development and graduated increased local production of weapons systems . It also encourages interoperability, and technological and industrial co-operation among the three services and related ministries and government agencies.
Dephan’s mandate is to cooperate closely with the Ministry of State Enterprises (Menneg BUMN) which has legal and financial control over five strategic industries: PT Pindad; PT PAL; PT Dana; PT LEN and PT DI; with the Ministry of Industry and the State Ministry for Science and Technology to prepare a long-term plan for developing defense industries which reduces reliance on foreign suppliers; and with the Ministry of Finance for purposes of fiscal accountability.
Logistics Planning
Logistics planning is an integral part of defense and operational planning. It aims to identify the different logistics capabilities that need to be acquired by the tri-services included in the Defense Planning Ministerial Guidance, and ensure that these capabilities are available to be used by the Command Units for operations. Logistics planning serves as the basis for the overarching cooperative logistics effort with the aim of improving the integration of national logistics planning processes during peace, crisis and conflict. At the force planning level, logistics planning consists of identification of the different civil and military capabilities that each service agree to acquire and to provide for joint-operations missions. The management of these capabilities in-theatre is then undertaken by Mabes TNI within the framework of the operational planning process.
C4SRI Planning
The effective performance of Indonesia’s political and military functions, requires the widespread utilization of Command, Control, Computer, Communication Surveillance, Reconnaissance, Information (C4SRI) systems, services and facilities, supported by appropriate personnel and agreed doctrine, organizations and procedures. C4SRI systems include communications, information, navigation and identification systems as well as sensor and warning installation systems, designed and operated in a networked and integrated form to meet the needs of the TNI. Individual C4SRI systems may be provided via common funded programs, or by joint-funded co-operative programs.
Co-ordinated C4SRI planning is an essential activity for the achievement of a nation-wide cohesive, cost-effective, interoperable and secure capability which can meet current and projected political and military requirements. It ensures that C4SRI activities conducted under all aspects of defense planning remain coherent throughout the life-cycle of systems and programs, and that end-products and services match real capability requirements.
C3I planning needs to encompass all elements needed for the achievement of capability. Capability does not just come from the provision of materiel (systems) and facilities, but also relies upon the existence of appropriate organization, training, logistics and personnel, and of relevant interoperability. In addition, the achievement of required system capability necessitates the application of a combination of the three core planning disciplines: resource, armaments and force planning. The C4SRI planning process influences and controls the activities of these planning areas to ensure a degree of coherence between them.
Civil Emergency Planning
Civil emergency planning has two basic dimensions: one dimension are the arrangements that are being made at the national level to protect civilian populations against the consequences of war, terrorist attacks, civic unrest and other major incidents or natural disasters. These include operational arrangements, such as disaster response coordination at national level. The other dimension is the planning to ensure that civil resources can be put to systematic and effective use in support of post-emergency strategy. In essence, this deals with the support that the civilian sector (e.g. transport, supply, communications) can give to the military, primarily in terms of civil support to the military in planning and operations, but also in terms of direct civilian support to crisis response operations.
In sum, civil emergency planning aims to coordinate national planning activity to ensure the most effective use of civil resources in collective support of national strategic objectives. It is a national responsibility and civil assets remain under national control at all times. However, national capabilities are harmonized to ensure that jointly developed plans and procedures will work and that necessary assets are readily available.
Selected Related Areas
There are a number of other related issues, which are closely linked to the defense planning process. These include air and naval technology planning, standardization, intelligence, operational planning, and force generation.
In brief, air defense planning enables members to harmonize their national efforts with international planning related to air command and control and air defense weapons. National air defense provides a network of interconnected systems enabling aircraft and tactical weapons to be detected either by maritime and ground-based systems or by interceptor aircraft. The extension of this air defense system with the civilian radar network is currently being considered by Dephan and the Ministry of Transportation (Dephub).
Naval technology planning aims to synchronize available domestic industry and foreign suppliers to ensure that maritime surveillance and defense match mid as well as long term requirements of deterrence as well as effective naval enforcement within and adjacent to Indonesia’s territorial seas.
Standardization is key to increasing the combined operational effectiveness of all military forces. It explores ways of improving cooperation and eliminating duplication in research, development, production, procurement and support of defense systems. Dephan leads in establishing industry standards, platforms and systems that affect production costs of key individual service requirements: e.g. infantry fighting vehicles for the Army, missile fast patrol boats for the Navy, transport aircraft for the Air Force.
Intelligence plays an important role in the defense planning process, in particular with the emergence of multidimensional security challenges such as terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Improved intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance as well as strategic assessment capacity are essential to ensure maximum warning and preparation time to counter armed and terrorist attacks. Intelligence sets out the requirements for the improved provision, exchange and analysis of political, economic, security and military intelligence, and closer coordination of the intelligence producers.
Successful military operations require the preparation of detailed plans to ensure that all the relevant factors have been carefully anticipated and weighed. The number of such factors is potentially great and includes the size, location, and likely duration of an operation; the necessary command arrangements; the rules under which it will be conducted ; special requirements imposed by the terrain, weather, and the availability (or otherwise) of local government support and the state of the local infrastructure; appraises the intentions and capabilities of adversaries; the need to collaborate with regional and international organizations; possible humanitarian emergency services.
Operational planning allows Dephan and Mabes TNI to prepare both for possible situations and for crisis response operations like those involving interdiction of illegal activities related to maritime security, border area surveillance and enforcement of binding legal agreements. Dephan/Mabes TNI develops, and periodically refines, operational planning processes that produce both advance (or contingency) plans and crisis response plans.
An essential element of this process is the requirement for political control and approval from the chief executive, and, where required by law, in consultation with and the consent of, the Commission for Defense and Foreign Affairs of Parliament (Komisi I, DPR-RI). The planning process needs to be flexible enough to accommodate interactive exchanges of political direction and military advice and to adapt plans to evolving political guidance during a crisis.
Force generation is the process by which Dephan indicate what forces and capabilities they will make available, for what period of time, against a list of requirements that Mabes TNI have elaborated for a particular operation, in the light of an operation plan, or for special needs like deployment or rotations of the Rapid Response Force.
Dephan is seeking to tighten the links between defense planning, operation planning, and force generation so that defense planning will be more rigorously conducted on the basis of likely future operational requirements. On the other, operation planning and force generation will be more fully guided by information on what capabilities are, or are likely in the future to be available. Dephan is also improving the force generation process itself to make it more comprehensive and forward-looking in the light of the country’s archipelagic structure.
Framework for Dephan’s defense planning and management process
In practical terms, there is need to standardize defense planning processes and defense management cycles. Each one of the services often devise individual and independent planning procedures and apply specific management methods unique to its mission. They also contribute differently to the overall aim of providing Dephan with the forces and capabilities to undertake the full range of its missions.
With the differences between the various components of the defense planning process and interrelated management areas, the need for harmonization and coordination is essential. While force planning has provided a basis for this harmonization and coordination, more was required. Dephan has directed the Agency for Research and Development (Balitbang)and Agency for Management Training(Badiklat) agencies to produce a comprehensive political guidance in support of the General Policy for National Defense.
Efforts to enhance and coordinate defense management are not limited to just within Dephan and Mabes TNI. Dephan needs to keep abreast of policy and strategic decisions undertaken by related ministries, especially the ministries for finance, national planning, industry, research and technology, maritime and fisheries, public works, energy and mineral resources.
The overall objective is to effectively and efficiently apply the capability requirements needed by utilizing the full range of human, natural as well as financial resources available to the government and to the nation as a whole.
Budget is never enough and will always stay not enough forever no matter what.But; your 3 cores area need a lot more than just budget. Strategic planning is strategic development.The major failure on strategic development in defence system in Indonesia (to my view) is wrong education. Too low and absolutely not broad enough and going nowhere.Your 3 cores area need a smart, intelligent and diligent manager to manage it. It is a huge task. Plus other task -efficiency and stop leakage-. Plus civic duty -civil emergency planning-. Plus special care -selected area-. I rewind all my reading about earth history. My beloved Republic might need (seriously) a combination of ‘all religion leaders’ + Cosimo de Medici. I still love my country. Wish you well after delivering, going through and surviving such a huge task for yourself.
Pusing pak!… karena duit dikit peralatan jadi minimal.
Duit ditambah banyak orang gembar-gembor pemborosan…
Sampai dengan di bulan Agustus 2008 ini, ternyata berdasarkan informasi di TV nasional , masih banyak veteran 45 yang nasibnya belum terurus oleh negara kita.
( bahkan ada informasi telah terjadi percaloan untuk pengurusan HAK pensiun mereka)
Ini hal yang fatal.
Menurutku pemerintah yang harus aktif mencari, mendatangi dan mendata mereka , bukan sebaliknya ( mengingat usia mereka dan sudah terlambat selama bertahun tahun)
Ini baru mashab manajemen -personalia yang Pancasila.
Karena itu ( sesuai dengan job description Bapak ) segara bentuklah tim khusus personalia yang mobile di tiap provinsi R.I, dilengkapai dengan transportasi dan alat komunikasi administrasi yang memadai.
Mobile SUV 4×4// Sepeda motor Kanzen Taurus, laptop, GPS, Handphone.
Usahakanlah dengan target Agustus tahun depan sudah harus tertangani semua.
Dirgahayu R.I yang ke 63, merdeka!
Selamat Pindahan Blog.
Dear Mr Sudarsono,
The Problems on budgeting in Indonesian goverment is always knew it too late. Forecasting and modeling on what the situations that may arise base on what ussualy happen in the past and posibilities/ chances that profitable, should be a common knowledge on policy makers. That what happen on oil gas problem that lead to budgeting problem. When US Navy Armada change direction, prepare for oil price hike. Budget need to revise the next day or at least make modeling budget if and what happen. Then now the financial crisis base on bad loan, now Indonesian can say to American welcome to club su***. But then Bu Sri have to aware that if company that buy our country loan bill/ sun or other bill are collapsing have optional lenders or we might get only loan of bulu *****. The world is becoming dynamic and the only certainty is the change itself.
If possible and do able Defence ministry should propose some kind think tank on this matter. Dewan Penasehat and other Dewan under pres are alot but all these doesnot have sounding anything about these kind of matters. They left pres uninformed and panicked. hopefully something have to change about this.
These kind of information and knowledges how to do about it should be not only for govt official but also private sector, well at least board of commissions should knew and have sound direction change. If not the market only become killing spree zone all price on IHSG become to bloody.
Thank for time to read this senseless comment. Also thank for RPP project hopefully satisfied to Dephan as well as other projects that I was involved in.
Have good health and dont panic
(I hate to have person as your stature panic. Ntar pak pres bikin apa lagi dan kesinambungan antar projects/ solutions tidak nyambung gitu loh 🙂 )
Saya pikir semua negara di dunia ini akan merasa kekuarangan anggaran dalam mengelola dan membangun pertahanannya, tetapi sesungguhnyalah persoalannya bukan di sana. Jika kita berpikir terus mengenai anggaran, maka kita akan terjebak dan akan terus berkutat di sana, sehingga pertahanan kita tidak pernah terbangun. Persoalannya adalah bagaimana kita ingin membangun pertahanan kita; itu dulu yang harus kita rumuskan. Keinginan bagaimana kita membangun pertahanan ini harus dibiarkan bebas, lepas, membentuk sunstansinya, jangan kemudian langsung “dibunuh” dengan “tidak ada anggaran”.
Setelah keinginan kita dalam membangun pertahanan diketahui, baru kemudian dari mana sumber dayanya. Nah kalau sudah berada di wilayah ini pertahanan jangan hanya dijadikan sektor, ingat salah satu tujuan nasional adalah melindungi segenap bangsa dan seluruh tumpah darah Indonesia, bukan hanya kesejahteraan umum dan mencerdaskan kehidupan bangsa dan yang dunia-dunia itu. Jika pemahaman ini sudah melekat pada segenap komponen bangsa maka sumber daya itu menjadi tidak terbatas. Membangun pertahanan tersedia sumber daya sebesar sumber daya yang dimiliki oleh bangsa. Jadi di mana sebenarnya sulitnya anggaran atau sumber daya itu diperoleh? Nah di sinilah diketahui persoalannya mengapa dikatakan sumber daya tidak terbatas, tetapi tidak pernah terpenuhi? Ketemulah persoalan utamanya, bahwa kesadaran bela negara segenap komponen bangsa masih sangat lemah. Karena sempitnya pemahaman ini sempit pula mereka memberikan sumber daya, tetapi jika sebaliknya luas pemahaman mereka tentang pertahanan luas pula sumber daya yang akan disediakan.
Dari gambaran tersebut membangun pertahanan yang perlu dipecahkan adalah 3:
1. Bagaimana pertahanan yang akan dibangun
2. Bagaimana komponen bangsa meresponnya dan harus berkembang pemahaman yang luas bahwa membangun pertahanan bukanlah membangun sektor melainkan upaya mencapai tujuan nasional
3. Membangun kesadaran bela negara seluruh warga negara.
Cukuplah prioritas fungsi pertahanan ini sekarang upayanya pada 3 fokus tersebut. Coba sekarang diitung-itung dianggaran yang sekarang ini dianggap sempit ini berapa alokasi yang diarahkan untuk 3 prioritas tersebut, saya yakin kecil. Kalau sudah demikian ya tidak akan lepas permasalahan yang dihadapi Dephan, yakni lingkaran setan yang berputar pada kurangnya anggaran melulu.
Di opini DMC ada tulisan tentang membangunpertahanan negara yang murah meriah, tolong dong pak pemikiran itu direspon, nampaknya ada benarnya lho.
Assalamu’alaikum
Pak Juwono S yang terhormat, selaku Menteri Pertahanan kami harap Bapak betul-betul fokus berpikir dan bekerja untuk meningkatkan pertahanan negara RI yang tercinta ini. Jangan sampai negara kita direndahkan oleh negara lain. Sebagai contoh tindakan tetangga kita Malaysia yang mengklaim perairan ambalat sebagai wilyahnya, dan bahkan seringkali kapal-kapal perang Malaysia memasuki wilayah perairan kita (ambalat).Contoh lain yaitu banyaknya penerbangan gelap di wilayah Indonesia bagian timur yang harus kita waspadai karena mengancam keutuhan negara RI.
Sebagai negara yang berdaulat dan bermartabat hal tersebut tentunya tidak boleh terjadi. Pemerintah RI harus melindungi dan mempertahankan setiap jengkal wilayah negara RI dan tidak ada negara manapun yang boleh mengusik.
Pak Juwono, Agar negara RI dapat mempertahankan dan menjaga kedaulatan atas wilayahnya sudah selayaknya didukung oleh alat pertahanan (TNI) yang kuat juga. Pembangunan dan perkuatan alat pertahanan pada saat ini mutlak sebagai sesuatu yang harus dilakukan oleh pemerintah mengingat banyaknya ancaman terhadap negara RI padasaat ini. Tentunya hal tersebut diperlukan pembiayaan atau dana yang memadai/cukup.
Pada saat ini anggaran yang diberikan pemerintah untuk sektor pertahanan sangat kecil hanya kurang lebih 35 T (rupiah) dan kabarnya masih akan dipangkas lagi. Dana dimaksud jauh lebih kecil dari anggaran yang diajukan.
Pak Juwono, kami sangat berharap agar bapak berjuang untuk meningkatkan alokasi anggaran untuk sektor pertahanan. Pak Juwono jangan kalah dengan Abu Rizal Bakri yang mampu mendapatkan anggaran dari pemerintah untuk membiayai kerugian akibat salah satu perusahaanya (Lapindo) yang menyebabkan tragedi “Lumpur Lapindo” dan terakhir akan mendapat bantuan dana untuk menolong perusahaanya (BUMI) yang kolaps.
Kami sebagai warga negara Indonesia sangat sedih memperhatikan bagaimana pemerintah kita pada saat ini melakukan alokasi anggaran. Kepentingan pribadi/kelompok justru lebih diutamakan dibanding kepentingan negara.
Sekali lagi Pak Juwono yang terhormat, kami mohon agar Bapak selaku Menteri Pertahanan (Orang yang paling bertanggung jawab terhadap pertahanan/keutuhan negara RI) dapat meningkatkan kemampuan pertahanan negara RI semaksimal mungkin. Sehingga kita memiliki kekuatan yang cukup dan tak ada negara lain yang berniat mengusik wilayah/kepentingan kita.
Demikian semoga Bapak dan Dephan diberikekuatan untuk dapat meningkatkan kemampuan pertahanan Negara RI.
Wassalamu’alaikum.
Assalamu’alaikum
Pak Juwono YTH, apakah dalam internal Dephan sudah memahami konsep ekonomi kreatif yg sekarang ini banyak didengungkan oleh Presiden SBY? sebab konsep ekonomi kreatif jangan hanya dilingkungan ranah ekonomi semata ( wilayah departemen tertentu saja ) sy menghimbau konsep ekonomi kreatif semestinya menjadi bagian penting pula dalam konsep pertahanan non militer dan saya mengharap Dephan serta Mabes TNI bisa mengakomodirnya. Sebagai contoh konsep pemberdayaan wilayah perbatasan oleh komunitas kreatif Indonesia, Menjaring komunitas “penghobi militer” oleh masyarakat sipil dalam bentuk bela negara ( yg bilamana mungkin bisa diwujudkan dlm bentuk komponen cadangan ) dan pemanfaatan fasilitas militer bagi pengembangan industri kreatif seperti di Kota Cimahi sebagai pengembangan industri kreatif spt pemanfaatan kawasan heritage yg asetnya dimiliki oleh Mabes TNI / Dephan.
Mohon untuk di balas
Asslm.Wr.Wb.
Pertahanan tradisional, benteng yang kokoh, kuda yang tangkas dan kemampuan memanah dan menombak yang tepat.
Menurut hemat saya, dengan terbatasnya anggaran Pertahanan untuk peralatan militer perlu kerjasama dengan departemen sipil.
Departemen PU untuk membentuk benteng dan sarana penghubung laut, darat dan udara.
Departemen Perhubungan untuk perawatan, operasi dan jaringan komunikasi pertahanan.
Departemen Pendidikan untuk SDM yang berkualitas, Imtaq, berkemampuan komputasi dan jaringan.
Kecukupan jaringan air bersih dan jaringan serat optik yang bebas interferensi bom elektronik, Palapa Ring II Kepulauan Indonesia, menjadi prioritas untuk pertahanan dan mencerdaskan bangsa.
Wallahu Alam B.
Wass.Wr.Wb.
A U G I
augispot.blogspot.com
Pak, klo kita mo melihat kebelakang pada saat Indonesia memiliki armada laut dan udara terbesar diasia pasifik pada tahun 60’an maka kita melihat bahwa peralatan tempur yang digunakan adalah buatan Rusia, kemudian pada dekade 80’an pada saat kita melakukan modernisasi peralatan tempur, kita membeli peralatan tempur dari amerika serikat dan eropa barat. Saat ini kita pun sedang melakukan modernisasi yang nampaknya akan cenderung ke rusia (dalam hal ini saya mendukung, daripada beli ke usa atau eropa terus diembargo lagi).
Sebagai pengambil kebijakan, pernahkah bapak berpikir bahwa kita mampu membuat pesawat tempur sendiri?? tentu kita tidak bisa berharap bahwa produk pertama PT DI memiliki kemampuan seperti Su-30 mkk, memiliki kemampuan seperti F5 Tiger atau A4 Skyhawk sudah luar biasa. Saya buka orang PT DI tapi saya yakin mereka mampu membuatnya, klo bapak tidak percaya coba percayakan pembuatan pesawat latih kepada mereka, ga usah prototype cukup blue print, saya yakin pesawat latih skelas KT-1 Wong Bee pasti bisa dibuat. Saya sakin Bapak pernah mendengar peribahasa ” jika seorang anak tidak pernah berani untuk jatuh, maka ia tidak pernah bisa berjalan”. Semoga dimasa mendatang semangat kemandirian untuk membuat alutsista bisa kita lakukan.
Menurut saya ada beberapa hal yang perlu dephan lakukan dalam waktu dekat,
1. Mengembangkan semangat kemandirian membuat alutsista, benar AD sudah mendapat Ranpur Anoa dari Pindad, AL sudah mendapat KRI-827 Krait, AU sudah mendapat cn 235 mp. Tetapi akan lebih baik jika kita mampu membuat pesawat tempur dan tank sendiri.
2. Tolong dengan sangat pak, lindungi proyek slv-1 Lapan. karena teknologi peroketan dan rudal balistik cuma beda tipis pak, saya yakin tidak semua negara berkenan Indonesia memiliki teknologi tersebut dan pasti mereka akan menawarkan berbagai proyek “murah” dengan imbalan Indonesia menghentikan proyek tersebut. Saya tahu pemerintahan Sby-Jk akan berakhir dalam hitungan bulan, jika bapak pada pemerintahan berikutnya tidak menjadi menhan lagi tolong sampaikan kepada menhan yang baru. Bukankah Korea Utara dan Iran tidak memiliki peraltan tempur canggih, tetapi cukup beberapa rudal balistik membuat mereka disegani.
3. Pak terus terang saya bingung dengan perjanjian MTA 1&2 dengan Singapura, setahu saya perjanjian yang dilakukan pada tahun 1995 sudah berakhir pada tahun 2001, tetapi kenapa sampai sekarang kita tidak mengambil alih dan mengontrol wilayah udara itu (saya yakin ATC di hang nadim atau ranai pasti bisa mengontrol wilayah itu). Pak, apa bapak tega melihat pesawat transpor dan militer kita yang melewati wilayah tersebut yang notabene adalah wilayah yuridiksi kita harus memutar lebih jauh karena dilarang oleh ATC Singapura. Pak, Malaysia dan Singapura berani bertindak kurang ajar kepada kita bukan karena mereka keberanian mereka, tetapi karena sikap apatis kita terhadap diri kita sendiri. Betul wilayah seluas MTA 1&2 tidak ada apa-apanya dibandingkan wilayah Indonesia yang luas, tetapi dimana harga diri kita klo mau masuk kerumah sendiri disuruh memutar oleh tetangga kita?
Pak soal Dephan menolak rencana hibah dari Qatar saya setuju jika alasannya adalah masalah rating pesawat tempur yang semakin banyak dan masalah pelatihan dan perawatan pesawat…
Tetapi yang saya sesalkan adalah anda menyamakan kemampuan kekuatan udara Singapura dan kita…
data dari mana pak?? jelas2 kemampauan mereka jauh diatas kita… Apa pembelian 10 Sukhoi sama dengan 24 24 F-15 Singapura?? Secara kuantitas sudah jauh beda, apalagi TNI tidak pernah melansir rudal air-to-air untuk Sukhoi jenis yang mana…
Saat ini Singapura punya 60 F 16 C/D,20 F5 Upgrade, 45 A4 Super Skyhawk (upgrade),Hawkeye 4 Unit, rudal AMRAM.. sementara di pekanbaru kita cuma punya hawk 100/200…. klo singapura mau, lanud disana bisa digempur dan hawk bisa dihancurkan saat masih didarat… mo dikirim bantuan dari mana pak, F-16 dari Iswahyudi atau sukhoi dari makassar.. keburu hancur pak pangkalan di pekanbaru…
Pak Silahkan anda tanya, kepada pilot F-16.. ketika mereka latihan bareng dengan Singapura dan Australia apa yg mereka dapat… Cakupan radar mereka lebih luas daripada kita.. dan mereka punya rudal air-to-air bvr., sementara kita cuma punya sidewinder…
Pak, ga semua rakyat ga ngerti soal pertahanan…
Kita bangsa yang besar.. tapi kemampuan kita untuk melindungi negara ini berada pada titik nadir…
pak mentri yang terhormat, tolong usahakan agar kita bisa membuat pesawat tempur senidri, karena banayak negara yang akan mengancam kedaulatan RI.
Yth Bapak Menhan,
Saya akan tidak membahas lebih banyak masalah pertahanan karena setiap ada masalah pasti semuanya berkaitan dengan masalah anggaran, saya dukung sepenuhnya keinginan RI untuk bisa mandiri dengan alutsista dalam negeri sendiri karena memang sudah saatnya indonesia bangkit kembali. Kalo mau saya berikan contoh saya selaku warga negara indonesia bersedia untuk menyumbangkan apa yang saya mampu baik secara pemikiran maupun kontribusi tidak langsung, salah satu contoh untuk mengatasi masalah anggaran seandainya saya memberikan sumbangan 100.000 saja alangkah baiknya seandainya diikuti oleh jumlah penduduk indonesia yang kurang lebih 220.000.000 jiwa untuk menutupi anggaran mealui forum khusus, karena terdesaknya negara ini dari masalah pertahanan yang sepertinya dinomor duakan.
Namun apabila pemerintah punya rencana lain, cobalah untuk menasionalisasi kembali aset-aset dalam negeri terlebih dahulu karena negara kita semakin tidak jelas arahnya karena terus diombang ambing pihak asing sepertinya secara militer kita belum dijajah namun secara ekonomi kita telah dijajah habis habisan.
Semoga kita bisa berdaulat kembali dan menjadi negara yang besar karena kalo bukan kita yang membenahi anak dan cucu kita lah yang akan merasakan penderitaannya.
Pak Menhan satu lagi sepertinya ada mismatch antara dept keuangan dan dept pertahanan pada masalah anggaran mungkin yang membuat sulit karena proses anggaran pertahanan yang berlarut cobalah untuk dibuatkan suatu sistem dengan skema yang lebih baik lagi agar semua anggaran bisa terserap dengan baik setiap tahunnya. Kalo seandainya masih ada korupsi pada anggaran negara kami selaku warga negara RI berharap bisa ditindak lebih tegas tanpa pandang bulu karena hanya akan merugikan bangsa kita semua. Sekian sedikit wacana dari saya semoga bisa bermanfaat “Jayalah Negeriku RI”.